↓ Skip to main content

Mind the Brain: The Mediating and Moderating Role of Neurophysiology

Overview of attention for article published in Trends in Cognitive Sciences, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
21 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Mind the Brain: The Mediating and Moderating Role of Neurophysiology
Published in
Trends in Cognitive Sciences, December 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.tics.2016.11.002
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Most studies involving experimental manipulations or interventions tailored to modulate behavior do not account for variability in the critical antecedent of behavior, the brain. Here, we describe elegant approaches to model the role that neurophysiology can play in mediating or moderating relationships in this context. We highlight the capacity for these approaches to improve the inferential power of research, bridge the gap between neural and behavioral levels of analysis, and bolster the prospects for reproducibility.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Brazil 2 2%
Italy 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 94 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 24%
Researcher 21 20%
Student > Master 13 13%
Professor 10 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Other 18 17%
Unknown 9 9%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 35 34%
Neuroscience 26 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 4%
Philosophy 2 2%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 20 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2018.
All research outputs
#3,398,910
of 32,308,582 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Cognitive Sciences
#1,358
of 2,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,734
of 439,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Cognitive Sciences
#17
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,308,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,632 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.4. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,316 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.