You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A research agenda for the science of actionable knowledge: Drawing from a review of the most misguided to the most enlightened claims in the science-policy interface literature
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Science & Policy, June 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.envsci.2023.03.004 |
| Authors |
Kripa Jagannathan, Geniffer Emmanuel, James Arnott, Katharine J. Mach, Aparna Bamzai-Dodson, Kristen Goodrich, Ryan Meyer, Mark Neff, K. Dana Sjostrom, Kristin M.F. Timm, Esther Turnhout, Gabrielle Wong-Parodi, Angela T. Bednarek, Alison Meadow, Art Dewulf, Christine J. Kirchhoff, Richard H. Moss, Leah Nichols, Eliza Oldach, Maria Carmen Lemos, Nicole Klenk |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 20% |
| United States | 4 | 20% |
| Canada | 2 | 10% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 5% |
| Finland | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 75% |
| Scientists | 2 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 64 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 30% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 11% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Professor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 14% |
| Unknown | 19 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 17 | 27% |
| Environmental Science | 14 | 22% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 19 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2023.
All research outputs
#2,436,310
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science & Policy
#569
of 2,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,873
of 388,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science & Policy
#7
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,669 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 388,748 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.