↓ Skip to main content

In silico repositioning of approved drugs for rare and neglected diseases

Overview of attention for article published in Drug Discovery Today, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
5 blogs
policy
1 policy source
patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
473 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
In silico repositioning of approved drugs for rare and neglected diseases
Published in
Drug Discovery Today, March 2011
DOI 10.1016/j.drudis.2011.02.016
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

One approach to speed up drug discovery is to examine new uses for existing approved drugs, so-called 'drug repositioning' or 'drug repurposing', which has become increasingly popular in recent years. Analysis of the literature reveals many examples of US Food and Drug Administration-approved drugs that are active against multiple targets (also termed promiscuity) that can also be used to therapeutic advantage for repositioning for other neglected and rare diseases. Using proof-of-principle examples, we suggest here that with current in silico technologies and databases of the structures and biological activities of chemical compounds (drugs) and related data, as well as close integration with in vitro screening data, improved opportunities for drug repurposing will emerge for neglected or rare/orphan diseases.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 473 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 8 2%
United Kingdom 6 1%
Brazil 4 <1%
Poland 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
India 2 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 443 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 91 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 88 19%
Student > Master 63 13%
Student > Bachelor 30 6%
Professor 28 6%
Other 101 21%
Unknown 72 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 89 19%
Chemistry 87 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 42 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 41 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 39 8%
Other 79 17%
Unknown 96 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,468,171
of 29,675,204 outputs
Outputs from Drug Discovery Today
#105
of 3,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,189
of 132,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drug Discovery Today
#1
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,675,204 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,015 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,507 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.