You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Haemodynamic changes during prone versus supine position in patients with COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Australian critical care : official journal of the Confederation of Australian Critical Care Nurses., March 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.aucc.2023.03.006 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Madeline Coxwell Matthewman, Fumitaka Yanase, Rahul Costa-Pinto, Daryl Jones, Dharshi Karalapillai, Lucy Modra, Sam Radford, Ida-Fong Ukor, Stephen Warrillow, Rinaldo Bellomo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 6 | 17% |
| United States | 4 | 11% |
| Italy | 3 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 8% |
| Sudan | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 16 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 58% |
| Scientists | 8 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 11% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 13 | 68% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 13 | 68% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,721,156
of 25,774,185 outputs
Outputs from Australian critical care : official journal of the Confederation of Australian Critical Care Nurses.
#72
of 837 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,896
of 425,514 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Australian critical care : official journal of the Confederation of Australian Critical Care Nurses.
#1
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,774,185 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 837 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,514 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.