↓ Skip to main content

Long‐Term Effectiveness of Screening for Hearing Loss: The Screening for Auditory Impairment—Which Hearing Assessment Test (SAI‐WHAT) Randomized Trial

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
4 policy sources
twitter
1 X user
guideline
2 clinical guideline sources

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Long‐Term Effectiveness of Screening for Hearing Loss: The Screening for Auditory Impairment—Which Hearing Assessment Test (SAI‐WHAT) Randomized Trial
Published in
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, March 2010
DOI 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02738.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
Unknown 131 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 16%
Student > Bachelor 17 13%
Researcher 16 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 20 15%
Unknown 26 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 18%
Psychology 12 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Other 23 17%
Unknown 30 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,277,669
of 27,057,185 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
#1,179
of 8,683 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,963
of 107,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
#4
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,057,185 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,683 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,949 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.