You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Specialist Perspectives on the Imaging Selection of Large Vessel Occlusion in the Late Window
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Neuroradiology, April 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00062-023-01284-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Piers Klein, Xiaochuan Huo, Yimin Chen, Mohamad Abdalkader, Zhongming Qiu, Simon Nagel, Jean Raymond, Liping Liu, James E. Siegler, Daniel Strbian, Thalia S. Field, Shadi Yaghi, Muhammad M. Qureshi, Jelle Demeestere, Volker Puetz, Anne Berberich, Patrik Michel, Urs Fischer, Johannes Kaesmacher, Hiroshi Yamagami, Fana Alemseged, Georgios Tsivgoulis, Wouter J. Schonewille, Wei Hu, Xinfeng Liu, Chuanhui Li, Xunming Ji, Brian Drumm, Soma Banerjee, Simona Sacco, Else C. Sandset, Espen Saxhaug Kristoffersen, Peter Slade, Robert Mikulik, Michele Romoli, Francesco Diana, Kailash Krishnan, Permesh Dhillon, Jin Soo Lee, Ekkehard Kasper, Hormuzdiyar Dasenbrock, Mai Duy Ton, Rytis Masiliūnas, Anita Ante Arsovska, João Pedro Marto, Adam A. Dmytriw, Robert W. Regenhardt, Gisele Sampaio Silva, Timo Siepmann, Dapeng Sun, Hongfei Sang, Jose Danilo Diestro, Pengfei Yang, Mahmoud H. Mohammaden, Fengli Li, Hesham E. Masoud, Alice Ma, Raynald, Aravind Ganesh, Jianmin Liu, Lukas Meyer, Diederik W. J. Dippel, Götz Thomalla, Mark Parsons, Adnan I. Qureshi, Mayank Goyal, Albert J. Yoo, Bertrand Lapergue, Osama O. Zaidat, Hui-Sheng Chen, Bruce C. V. Campbell, Tudor G. Jovin, Raul G. Nogueira, Zhongrong Miao, Gustavo Saposnik, Thanh N. Nguyen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | 27% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 6% |
| Italy | 3 | 6% |
| Spain | 2 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Finland | 1 | 2% |
| Zimbabwe | 1 | 2% |
| Egypt | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 19 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 43% |
| Scientists | 18 | 37% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 3 | 38% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 25% |
| Researcher | 1 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 1 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 4 | 50% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 13% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 13% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 13% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,234,341
of 25,600,774 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Neuroradiology
#1
of 348 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,787
of 422,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Neuroradiology
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,600,774 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 348 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,461 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them