You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluation of spectral collection strategies for identification of Dalbergia spp. using handheld laser‐induced breakdown spectroscopy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Chemometrics, May 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1002/cem.3479 |
| Authors |
Caelin P. Celani, Rachel A. McCormick, Amelia M. Speed, William Johnston, James A. Jordan, Tyler B. Coplen, Karl S. Booksh |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 14% |
| Researcher | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 5 | 71% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 5 | 71% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2023.
All research outputs
#1,992,950
of 23,717,467 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Chemometrics
#2
of 573 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,997
of 204,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Chemometrics
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,717,467 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 573 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,533 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them