↓ Skip to main content

Double‐blind peer review affects reviewer ratings and editor decisions at an ecology journal

Overview of attention for article published in Functional Ecology, April 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#5 of 2,820)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Double‐blind peer review affects reviewer ratings and editor decisions at an ecology journal
Published in
Functional Ecology, April 2023
DOI 10.1111/1365-2435.14259
Authors

Charles W. Fox, Jennifer Meyer, Emilie Aimé

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 946 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 67 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 15%
Student > Master 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 13 19%
Unknown 12 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 36%
Environmental Science 12 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 4%
Computer Science 3 4%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 19 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 680. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2024.
All research outputs
#31,662
of 25,808,886 outputs
Outputs from Functional Ecology
#5
of 2,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#839
of 424,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Functional Ecology
#1
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,808,886 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,820 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,711 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.