↓ Skip to main content

Spatial Response of Mammals to Late Quaternary Environmental Fluctuations

Overview of attention for article published in Science, June 1996
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
349 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Spatial Response of Mammals to Late Quaternary Environmental Fluctuations
Published in
Science, June 1996
DOI 10.1126/science.272.5268.1601
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Analyses of fossil mammal faunas from 2945 localities in the United States demonstrate that the geographic ranges of individual species shifted at different times, in different directions, and at different rates in response to late Quaternary environmental fluctuations. The geographic pattern of faunal provinces was similar for the late Pleistocene and late Holocene, but differing environmental gradients resulted in dissimilar species composition for these biogeographic regions. Modern community patterns emerged only in the last few thousand years, and many late Pleistocene communities do not have modern analogs. Faunal heterogeneity was greater in the late Pleistocene.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 349 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 9 3%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Montenegro 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Other 7 2%
Unknown 317 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 84 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 73 21%
Student > Master 32 9%
Student > Bachelor 30 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 6%
Other 66 19%
Unknown 42 12%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 160 46%
Environmental Science 57 16%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 37 11%
Social Sciences 16 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 2%
Other 16 5%
Unknown 55 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2022.
All research outputs
#4,019,182
of 26,460,266 outputs
Outputs from Science
#38,201
of 83,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,904
of 26,815 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#52
of 230 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,460,266 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,766 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 67.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 26,815 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 230 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.