You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Weaving Indigenous and Western ways of knowing in ecotoxicology and wildlife health: a review of Canadian studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Reviews, April 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1139/er-2022-0087 |
| Authors |
Lydia R. Johnson, Alana A. E. Wilcox, Steven M. Alexander, Ella Bowles, Heather Castleden, Dominique A. Henri, Chris Herc, Lucas King, Jennifer F. Provencher, Diane M. Orihel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 12 | 36% |
| United States | 5 | 15% |
| South Africa | 1 | 3% |
| Norway | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 55% |
| Scientists | 11 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 9% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 24% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 24% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 24% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2023.
All research outputs
#904,017
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Reviews
#27
of 405 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,252
of 420,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Reviews
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 405 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,739 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them