You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The Wald Confidence Interval for a Binomial p as an Illuminating “Bad” Example
|
---|---|
Published in |
The American Statistician, April 2023
|
DOI | 10.1080/00031305.2023.2183257 |
Authors |
Per Gösta Andersson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 63 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 16 | 25% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 5% |
France | 3 | 5% |
Australia | 3 | 5% |
Canada | 2 | 3% |
Netherlands | 2 | 3% |
Denmark | 1 | 2% |
Italy | 1 | 2% |
Poland | 1 | 2% |
Other | 8 | 13% |
Unknown | 23 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 37 | 59% |
Scientists | 21 | 33% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 6% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 29% |
Researcher | 4 | 29% |
Student > Master | 2 | 14% |
Professor | 1 | 7% |
Other | 1 | 7% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 2 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mathematics | 5 | 36% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 14% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 7% |
Psychology | 1 | 7% |
Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 7% |
Other | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 3 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,009,223
of 25,340,976 outputs
Outputs from The American Statistician
#32
of 1,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,004
of 411,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The American Statistician
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,340,976 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,085 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 411,310 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them