↓ Skip to main content

Occupational Hydrocarbon Exposure and Renal Histopathology

Overview of attention for article published in Toxicology and Industrial Health, October 1987
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Occupational Hydrocarbon Exposure and Renal Histopathology
Published in
Toxicology and Industrial Health, October 1987
DOI 10.1177/074823378700300404
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

A blinded, retrospective study of histological sections from ten hydrocarbon-exposed and twenty unexposed nephrectomized renal cell carcinoma cases was conducted to evaluate the histopathologic features present in the apparently normal kidney parenchyma removed with the tumor. Tissue sections from each of the thirty cases were independently reviewed by three consulting pathologists and scored using well defined criteria. Occupational hydrocarbon exposure indices were developed by a team of industrial hygienists and applied to the detailed occupational history of each exposed case. A positive correlation was observed between age and the total renal pathology score (rs = .40, p less than .03). No correlation was found between indices of occupational hydrocarbon exposure and renal pathology scores among exposed cases. No significant differences in renal pathology scores were noted when exposed cases were matched to unexposed cases by age, sex, and race. These results are limited by the inclusion of only cases with historical hydrocarbon exposures. It is recommended that a follow-up study be conducted, utilizing sensitive quantitative methods, to define what, if any, cytopathologic renal effects occur in conjunction with current occupational exposures to hydrocarbons.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 1995.
All research outputs
#8,842,575
of 26,265,706 outputs
Outputs from Toxicology and Industrial Health
#196
of 757 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,241
of 11,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Toxicology and Industrial Health
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,265,706 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 757 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 11,053 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.