↓ Skip to main content

Risks and Benefits of Bladder Antimuscarinics Among Elderly Residents of Veterans Affairs Community Living Centers

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Risks and Benefits of Bladder Antimuscarinics Among Elderly Residents of Veterans Affairs Community Living Centers
Published in
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, April 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.jamda.2013.03.008
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To evaluate risks and benefits of bladder antimuscarinics (BAMs) among elderly long term care nursing home residents.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Sweden 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 109 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 12%
Researcher 13 12%
Other 9 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Other 21 19%
Unknown 32 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 5%
Social Sciences 6 5%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 43 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2021.
All research outputs
#8,879,515
of 33,779,198 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
#1,692
of 3,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,409
of 234,884 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
#24
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,779,198 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,705 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 234,884 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.