↓ Skip to main content

Reference intervals: past, present, and future

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences, April 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reference intervals: past, present, and future
Published in
Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences, April 2023
DOI 10.1080/10408363.2023.2196746
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kelly Doyle, Dustin R. Bunch

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 15%
Researcher 2 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 15%
Computer Science 1 8%
Social Sciences 1 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 8%
Engineering 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 54%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2023.
All research outputs
#14,214,215
of 23,565,002 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences
#210
of 330 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,939
of 246,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,565,002 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 330 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,064 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.