You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
歩行において右股関節屈曲位が継続することで右遊脚が困難であった脳出血後右片麻痺患者の理学療法
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Kansai Physical Therapy, December 2016
|
| DOI | 10.11354/jkpt.16.101 |
| Authors |
淵本 恵, 辻 智美, 貝尻 望, 藤本 将志, 大沼 俊博, 渡邊 裕文, 鈴木 俊明 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2023.
All research outputs
#17,637,892
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Kansai Physical Therapy
#45
of 120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#270,919
of 424,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Kansai Physical Therapy
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 120 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.4. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,689 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.