You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Left bundle branch pacing versus biventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Pacing & Clinical Electrophysiology, April 2023
|
DOI | 10.1111/pace.14700 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Antonio Parlavecchio, Giampaolo Vetta, Rodolfo Caminiti, Giovanni Coluccia, Michele Magnocavallo, Manuela Ajello, Lorenzo Pistelli, Giuseppe Dattilo, Rosario Foti, Scipione Carerj, Domenico Giovanni Della Rocca, Pasquale Crea, Pietro Palmisano |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Turkey | 3 | 20% |
United States | 1 | 7% |
Taiwan | 1 | 7% |
Brazil | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 9 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 11 | 73% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 20% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 20% |
Other | 1 | 10% |
Professor | 1 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 10% |
Student > Master | 1 | 10% |
Other | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 40% |
Computer Science | 1 | 10% |
Engineering | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2023.
All research outputs
#3,764,355
of 25,753,031 outputs
Outputs from Pacing & Clinical Electrophysiology
#108
of 3,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,351
of 423,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pacing & Clinical Electrophysiology
#3
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,753,031 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,292 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,644 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.