↓ Skip to main content

Renin-Angiotensin System Modulation With Synthetic Angiotensin (1-7) and Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor–Biased Ligand in Adults With COVID-19

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, April 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
37 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Renin-Angiotensin System Modulation With Synthetic Angiotensin (1-7) and Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor–Biased Ligand in Adults With COVID-19
Published in
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, April 2023
DOI 10.1001/jama.2023.3546
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wesley H. Self, Matthew S. Shotwell, Kevin W. Gibbs, Marjolein de Wit, D. Clark Files, Michelle Harkins, Kristin M. Hudock, Lisa H. Merck, Ari Moskowitz, Krystle D. Apodaca, Aaron Barksdale, Basmah Safdar, Ali Javaheri, Jeffrey M. Sturek, Harry Schrager, Nicole Iovine, Brian Tiffany, Ivor S. Douglas, Joseph Levitt, Laurence W. Busse, Adit A. Ginde, Samuel M. Brown, David N. Hager, Katherine Boyle, Abhijit Duggal, Akram Khan, Michael Lanspa, Peter Chen, Michael Puskarich, Derek Vonderhaar, Lokesh Venkateshaiah, Nina Gentile, Yves Rosenberg, James Troendle, Amanda J. Bistran-Hall, Josh DeClercq, Robert Lavieri, Meghan Morrison Joly, Michael Orr, Jill Pulley, Todd W. Rice, Jonathan S. Schildcrout, Matthew W. Semler, Li Wang, Gordon R. Bernard, Sean P. Collins, Richard C. Becker, Gregory del Zoppo, Peter Henke, Richard Holubkov, Maryl Johnson, Kim Kerr, Hannah I. Lipman, Fedor Lurie, Bertram Pitt, Sara K. Vesely, Jerome L. Fleg, Dave Aamodt, J'Mario Ayers, Debra Clark, Jessica Collins, Maya Cook, Sheri Dixon, John Graves, Courtney Jordan, Christopher J. Lindsell, Itzel Lopez, David McKeel, Dirk Orozco, Nelson Prato, Ally Qi, Madiha Qutab, Christa Stoughton, Krista Vermillion, Kelly Walsh, Stephanie Winchell, Taylor Young, Richard Franklin, Elizabeth Wagner, Thomas Walther, Mark Demitrack, Jakea Johnson, Ryan Walsh, Brian Bales, Karen Miller, Donna Torr, Harsh Barot, Leigha Landreth, Mary LaRose, Lisa Parks, J. Pedro Teixeira, Sandra Cardenas, Juan A. Ceniceros, Amy G. Cunningham, Susan Kunkel, Debbie M. Lovato, Brooklin Zimmerman, Thanh Nguyen, Wesley Zeger, Heather Nichols, Noah Wiedel, Ali Javaheri, Stephanie Stilinovic, Carolyn Brokowski, Jing Lu, Muriel Solberg, Dana Lee, Kristopher Roach, Brian Tiffany, Charlotte Tanner, Annette Taylor, Jennine Zumbahl, Aamer Syed, Jessica Mason, Patrick E. H. Jackson, Rachael W. Coleman, Heather M. Haughey, Kartik Cherabuddi, Nastasia James, Rebecca Wakeman, Christopher Duncan, Cynthia Montero, Angela J. Rogers, Jennifer G. Wilson, Rosemary Vojnik, Cynthia Perez, David Wyles, Terra D. Hiller, Judy L. Oakes, Ana Z. Garcia, Michelle Gong, Amira Mohamed, Luke Andrea, Rahul Nair, William Nkemdirim, Brenda Lopez, Sabah Boujid, Martha Torres, Ofelia Garcia, Flora Martinez, Amiran Baduashvili, Jill Bastman, Lakshmi Chauhan, David J. Douin, Lani Finck, Ashley Licursi, Caitlin ten Lohuis, Sophia Zhang, William Bender, Santiago Tovar, Sharon Hayes, Nicholas Kurtzman, Elinita Rosseto, Douglas Scaffidi, Nathan Shapiro, Jonathan Pak, Gopal Allada, Genesis Briceno, Jose Peña, Minn Oh, Harith Ali, Sasha Beselman, Yolanda Eby, Vitaliy Klimov, R. Duncan Hite, Hammad Tanzeem, Chris Droege, Jessica Winter, Susan Jackman, Antonina Caudill, Emad Bayoumi, Ethan Pascual, Po-En Chen, Simon Mucha, Nirosshan Thiruchelvam, Matthew Siuba, Omar Mehkri, Brian E. Driver, Audrey F. Hendrickson, Olivia R. Kaus, Christina Ontiveros, Amy Riehm, Sylvia Laudun, Debra Hudock, Christopher Ensley, Valerie Shaner, Nina Gentile, Derek Isenberg, Hannah Reimer, Paul Cincola, Estelle S. Harris, Sean J. Callahan, Misty B. Yamane, Macy AG Barrios, Neeraj Desai, Amit Bharara, Michael Keller, Prat Majumder, Carrie Dohe, Jeanine D’Armiento, Monica Goldklang, Gebhard Wagener, Laura Fonseca, Itzel Valezquez-Sanchez, Nicholas J. Johnson, Emily Petersen, Megan Fuentes, Maranda Newton, Stephanie Gundel, Vasisht Srinivasan, Tessa Steel, Bryce Robinson

Abstract

Preclinical models suggest dysregulation of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection may increase the relative activity of angiotensin II compared with angiotensin (1-7) and may be an important contributor to COVID-19 pathophysiology. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of RAS modulation using 2 investigational RAS agents, TXA-127 (synthetic angiotensin [1-7]) and TRV-027 (an angiotensin II type 1 receptor-biased ligand), that are hypothesized to potentiate the action of angiotensin (1-7) and mitigate the action of the angiotensin II. Two randomized clinical trials including adults hospitalized with acute COVID-19 and new-onset hypoxemia were conducted at 35 sites in the US between July 22, 2021, and April 20, 2022; last follow-up visit: July 26, 2022. A 0.5-mg/kg intravenous infusion of TXA-127 once daily for 5 days or placebo. A 12-mg/h continuous intravenous infusion of TRV-027 for 5 days or placebo. The primary outcome was oxygen-free days, an ordinal outcome that classifies a patient's status at day 28 based on mortality and duration of supplemental oxygen use; an adjusted odds ratio (OR) greater than 1.0 indicated superiority of the RAS agent vs placebo. A key secondary outcome was 28-day all-cause mortality. Safety outcomes included allergic reaction, new kidney replacement therapy, and hypotension. Both trials met prespecified early stopping criteria for a low probability of efficacy. Of 343 patients in the TXA-127 trial (226 [65.9%] aged 31-64 years, 200 [58.3%] men, 225 [65.6%] White, and 274 [79.9%] not Hispanic), 170 received TXA-127 and 173 received placebo. Of 290 patients in the TRV-027 trial (199 [68.6%] aged 31-64 years, 168 [57.9%] men, 195 [67.2%] White, and 225 [77.6%] not Hispanic), 145 received TRV-027 and 145 received placebo. Compared with placebo, both TXA-127 (unadjusted mean difference, -2.3 [95% CrI, -4.8 to 0.2]; adjusted OR, 0.88 [95% CrI, 0.59 to 1.30]) and TRV-027 (unadjusted mean difference, -2.4 [95% CrI, -5.1 to 0.3]; adjusted OR, 0.74 [95% CrI, 0.48 to 1.13]) resulted in no difference in oxygen-free days. In the TXA-127 trial, 28-day all-cause mortality occurred in 22 of 163 patients (13.5%) in the TXA-127 group vs 22 of 166 patients (13.3%) in the placebo group (adjusted OR, 0.83 [95% CrI, 0.41 to 1.66]). In the TRV-027 trial, 28-day all-cause mortality occurred in 29 of 141 patients (20.6%) in the TRV-027 group vs 18 of 140 patients (12.9%) in the placebo group (adjusted OR, 1.52 [95% CrI, 0.75 to 3.08]). The frequency of the safety outcomes was similar with either TXA-127 or TRV-027 vs placebo. In adults with severe COVID-19, RAS modulation (TXA-127 or TRV-027) did not improve oxygen-free days vs placebo. These results do not support the hypotheses that pharmacological interventions that selectively block the angiotensin II type 1 receptor or increase angiotensin (1-7) improve outcomes for patients with severe COVID-19. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04924660.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 12%
Other 4 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 24 56%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 21%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Unspecified 1 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 24 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 102. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2024.
All research outputs
#525,781
of 34,575,175 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#5,611
of 42,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,803
of 449,684 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#83
of 399 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,575,175 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,566 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 73.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,684 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 399 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.