Context and issues: Rural regions in Southeastern USA are predominantly under-resourced and have poorer health outcomes compared to national averages. People living in rural Appalachia with intersectional identities often have limited choices in providers along with other systemic barriers to obtaining good health care. Barriers to competent and safe health care disproportionately impact people who are marginalized because of their identity. For transgender patients in South Central Appalachia, intersectional identities constitute barriers to receiving competent health care and increase the risk of poorer health outcomes. Literature indicates providers nationally receive on average between 45 minutes and 5 hours of training on transgender healthcare provision, which may exacerbate poor care experiences in South Central Appalachia. The present study aimed to develop and implement a training program for rural-serving medical residents in primary care in South Central Appalachia. A six-stage pilot development study is described. Lessons learned: This project developed a cultural competency training for rural-serving medical providers specific to transgender health needs. The Kern Model was utilized to structure the development of this training. Data from clinic stakeholders, resident liaisons, and transgender community members were utilized throughout phases of development. Two major themes arose from planning with these key stakeholders: accessibility/reusability of the material and usefulness of the material to the residents. Stakeholders were asked to identify areas of competency that would be beneficial for their practices and what baseline information would be necessary for all participants to know. Trainings were a hybrid of virtual and live delivery to pivot in response to space allocations at each clinic and to allow residents who were on hospital rotations to attend. An educational consultant was utilized to inform the best style of training design to meet the stated pedagogical goals. Previous studies have indicated that medical providers receive limited training on transgender health needs. However, there is also literature suggesting differences in general medical education due to resource competition. Therefore, developing sustainable, accessible, and useful medical education is imperative. The inclusion of resident and community member feedback in the content creation of this project allowed customization to community and resident needs. Stakeholder input on the pedagogy of this project was also imperative due to physical space constraints with social distancing guidelines. This training highlights the value in engaging virtual curricula, as it allows optimal accessibility for rural clinics. This project aimed to develop a training specific for South Central Appalachian providers that was informed by transgender people in the region and tailored specifically for regional providers based on stakeholder input. The resulting training may be an invaluable tool for future medical providers in a rural-serving region that is medically, educationally under-resourced and experiences inflated intersectional discrimination at systemic and interpersonal levels.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2023.
All research outputs
#12,359,443
of 34,412,533 outputs
Outputs from Rural & Remote Health
#313
of 1,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,495
of 448,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Rural & Remote Health
#13
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,412,533 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,036 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,758 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
