↓ Skip to main content

Insulin resistance in patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Oncologica, April 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 2,030)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
21 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
286 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
3 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Insulin resistance in patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
Acta Oncologica, April 2023
DOI 10.1080/0284186x.2023.2197124
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joan M. Màrmol, Michala Carlsson, Steffen H. Raun, Mia K. Grand, Jonas Sørensen, Louise Lang Lehrskov, Erik A. Richter, Ole Norgaard, Lykke Sylow

Abstract

Insulin resistance is a critical cause of metabolic dysfunctions. Metabolic dysfunction is common in patients with cancer and is associated with higher cancer recurrence rates and reduced overall survival. Yet, insulin resistance is rarely considered in the clinic and thus it is uncertain how frequently this condition occurs in patients with cancer. To address this knowledge gap, we performed a systematic review and a meta-analysis guided by the Preferred Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. We included studies assessing insulin resistance in patients with various cancer diagnoses, using the gold-standard hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp method. Studies eligible for inclusion were as follows: (1) included cancer patients older than 18 years of age; (2) included an age-matched control group consisting of individuals without cancer or other types of neoplasms; (3) measured insulin sensitivity using the hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp method. We searched the databases MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for articles published from database inception through March 2023 with no language restriction, supplemented by backward and forward citation searching. Bias was assessed using funnel plot. Fifteen studies satisfied the criteria. The mean insulin-stimulated rate of glucose disposal (Rd) was 7.5 mg/kg/min in control subjects (n = 154), and 4.7 mg/kg/min in patients with a cancer diagnosis (n = 187). Thus, the Rd mean difference was -2.61 mg/kg/min [95% confidence interval, -3.04; -2.19], p<.01). Heterogeneity among the included studies was insignificant (p=.24). These findings suggest that patients with a cancer diagnosis are markedly insulin resistant. As metabolic dysfunction in patients with cancer associates with increased recurrence and reduced overall survival, future studies should address if ameliorating insulin resistance in this population can improve these outcomes thereby improving patient care.Key pointsMetabolic dysfunction increases cancer recurrence rates and reduces survival for patients with cancer.Insulin resistance is a critical cause of metabolic dysfunctions.To date, no comprehensive compilation of research investigating insulin resistance in cancer patients has been produced.In this meta-analysis, we found that patients with various cancers were markedly insulin-resistant.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 286 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 5 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Other 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 15 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 15%
Unspecified 5 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 9%
Chemical Engineering 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 15 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 343. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2024.
All research outputs
#97,452
of 25,805,386 outputs
Outputs from Acta Oncologica
#4
of 2,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,478
of 423,772 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Oncologica
#1
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,805,386 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,030 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,772 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.