↓ Skip to main content

Industry Perspective on the Pharmacokinetic and ADME Characterization of Heterobifunctional Protein Degraders

Overview of attention for article published in Drug Metabolism and Disposition, April 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
32 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Industry Perspective on the Pharmacokinetic and ADME Characterization of Heterobifunctional Protein Degraders
Published in
Drug Metabolism and Disposition, April 2023
DOI 10.1124/dmd.122.001154
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laurie P Volak, Heide Marika Duevel, Sara Humphreys, David Nettleton, Colin Phipps, Andy Pike, Caroline Rynn, Paul Scott-Stevens, Donglu Zhang, Michael Zientek

Abstract

Targeted protein degraders (TPDs), specifically the bifunctional protein degraders discussed in this manuscript, consist of two linked ligands for a protein of interest and an E3 ligase, resulting in molecules which largely violate accepted physicochemical limits (e.g. Lipinski's Rule of 5) for oral bioavailability. In 2021, the IQ Consortium Degrader DMPK/ADME Working Group undertook a survey of eighteen IQ member and non-member companies working on degraders to understand whether the characterization and optimization of these molecules were different from any other beyond the Rule of 5 (bRo5) compounds. Additionally, the working group sought to identify PK/ADME areas in need of further evaluation and where additional tools could aid in more rapid advancement of TPDs to patients. The survey revealed that although TPDs reside in a challenging bRo5 physicochemical space, most respondents focus their efforts on oral delivery. Physicochemical properties required for oral bioavailability were generally consistent across the companies surveyed. Many of the member companies used modified assays to address challenging degrader properties (e.g. solubility, non-specific binding), but only half indicated that they modified their drug discovery workflows. The survey also suggested the need for further scientific investigation in the areas of CNS penetration, active transport, renal elimination, lymphatic absorption, in silico/machine learning, and human pharmacokinetic prediction. Based on the survey results, the Degrader DMPK/ADME Working Group concludes that TPD evaluation does not fundamentally differ from other bRo5 compounds, but requires some modification compared to traditional small molecules and proposes a generic workflow for PK/ADME evaluation of bifunctional TPDs. Significance Statement Based on an industry survey, this article provides an understanding of the current state of ADME science pertaining to characterizing and optimizing targeted protein degraders, specifically bifunctional protein degraders, based upon the responses provided by 18 IQ consortium members and non-members developing targeted protein degraders to treat disease. Additionally, this article puts into context the differences / similarities in methods and strategies utilized for heterobifunctional protein degraders compared to other bRo5 molecules and those used for conventional small molecule drugs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 29%
Other 2 6%
Unspecified 2 6%
Student > Master 2 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 10 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 9 29%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 10%
Unspecified 2 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 10 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2023.
All research outputs
#2,288,359
of 25,959,914 outputs
Outputs from Drug Metabolism and Disposition
#54
of 2,586 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,667
of 422,527 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drug Metabolism and Disposition
#2
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,959,914 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,586 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,527 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.