↓ Skip to main content

Mucosal vaccines for SARS-CoV-2: scientific gaps and opportunities—workshop report

Overview of attention for article published in npj Vaccines, April 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
14 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
79 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mucosal vaccines for SARS-CoV-2: scientific gaps and opportunities—workshop report
Published in
npj Vaccines, April 2023
DOI 10.1038/s41541-023-00654-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jane M. Knisely, Lucas E. Buyon, Rebecca Mandt, Rebecca Farkas, Shobana Balasingam, Karin Bok, Ursula J. Buchholz, M. Patricia D’Souza, Jennifer L. Gordon, Deborah F. L. King, Tung T. Le, Wolfgang W. Leitner, Robert A. Seder, Alkis Togias, Stig Tollefsen, David W. Vaughn, Daniel N. Wolfe, Kimberly L. Taylor, Anthony S. Fauci

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 79 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 15 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 12 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Chemical Engineering 1 3%
Unknown 18 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 149. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2024.
All research outputs
#282,218
of 25,761,363 outputs
Outputs from npj Vaccines
#51
of 836 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,707
of 423,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age from npj Vaccines
#3
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,761,363 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 836 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 48.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,433 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.