↓ Skip to main content

Electrotonic coupling of excitable and nonexcitable cells in the heart revealed by optogenetics

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
4 X users
patent
3 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
214 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Electrotonic coupling of excitable and nonexcitable cells in the heart revealed by optogenetics
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, December 2016
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1611184114
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 214 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Taiwan 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 210 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 24%
Researcher 30 14%
Student > Bachelor 20 9%
Student > Master 17 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 6%
Other 38 18%
Unknown 44 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 18%
Engineering 35 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 8%
Neuroscience 6 3%
Other 32 15%
Unknown 58 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 68. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2026.
All research outputs
#790,671
of 34,359,530 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#12,224
of 118,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,101
of 457,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#224
of 909 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,359,530 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 118,929 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,644 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 909 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.