You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Assessment of heterogeneity among participants in the Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative cohort using α-synuclein seed amplification: a cross-sectional study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Lancet Neurology, May 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s1474-4422(23)00109-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrew Siderowf, Luis Concha-Marambio, David-Erick Lafontant, Carly M Farris, Yihua Ma, Paula A Urenia, Hieu Nguyen, Roy N Alcalay, Lana M Chahine, Tatiana Foroud, Douglas Galasko, Karl Kieburtz, Kalpana Merchant, Brit Mollenhauer, Kathleen L Poston, John Seibyl, Tanya Simuni, Caroline M Tanner, Daniel Weintraub, Aleksandar Videnovic, Seung Ho Choi, Ryan Kurth, Chelsea Caspell-Garcia, Christopher S Coffey, Mark Frasier, Luis M A Oliveira, Samantha J Hutten, Todd Sherer, Kenneth Marek, Claudio Soto, Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 390 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 116 | 30% |
| United Kingdom | 23 | 6% |
| Canada | 12 | 3% |
| Spain | 9 | 2% |
| Mexico | 6 | 2% |
| Australia | 6 | 2% |
| Germany | 5 | 1% |
| Ecuador | 4 | 1% |
| Brazil | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 35 | 9% |
| Unknown | 170 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 294 | 75% |
| Scientists | 56 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 25 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 15 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 255 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 255 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 64 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 5% |
| Professor | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 39 | 15% |
| Unknown | 84 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 52 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 24 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 14 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 36 | 14% |
| Unknown | 90 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3232. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,939
of 25,768,270 outputs
Outputs from Lancet Neurology
#2
of 4,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50
of 411,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lancet Neurology
#1
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,768,270 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,068 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 411,188 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.