↓ Skip to main content

The T-cell-directed vaccine BNT162b4 encoding conserved non-spike antigens protects animals from severe SARS-CoV-2 infection

Overview of attention for article published in Cell, April 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#50 of 17,273)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
52 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
2714 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The T-cell-directed vaccine BNT162b4 encoding conserved non-spike antigens protects animals from severe SARS-CoV-2 infection
Published in
Cell, April 2023
DOI 10.1016/j.cell.2023.04.007
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christina M Arieta, Yushu Joy Xie, Daniel A Rothenberg, Huitian Diao, Dewi Harjanto, Shirisha Meda, Krisann Marquart, Byron Koenitzer, Tracey E Sciuto, Alexander Lobo, Adam Zuiani, Stefanie A Krumm, Carla Iris Cadima Couto, Stephanie Hein, André P Heinen, Thomas Ziegenhals, Yunpeng Liu-Lupo, Annette B Vogel, John R Srouji, Stephanie Fesser, Kaushik Thanki, Kerstin Walzer, Theresa A Addona, Özlem Türeci, Uğur Şahin, Richard B Gaynor, Asaf Poran

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2,714 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Other 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 16 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 14 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 8%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 15 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1709. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2024.
All research outputs
#6,299
of 25,768,270 outputs
Outputs from Cell
#50
of 17,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#183
of 422,983 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell
#2
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,768,270 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,273 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 59.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,983 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.