↓ Skip to main content

The Mating of a Fly

Overview of attention for article published in Science, June 1994
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
266 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The Mating of a Fly
Published in
Science, June 1994
DOI 10.1126/science.8209251
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Courtship in Drosophila is influenced by a wide variety of genes, in that many different kinds of pleiotropic mutations lead to defective courtship. This may seem to be a truism, but the broad temporal and spatial expression of most of the fly's "neuro genes" makes it difficult to exclude elements of such genes' actions as materially underlying reproductive behavior. "Courtship genes" that seem to play more particular roles were originally identified as sensory, learning, or rhythm mutations; their reproductive abnormalities have been especially informative for revealing components of male or female actions that might otherwise have gone unnoticed. Further behavioral mutations seemed originally to be courtship-specific, turned out not to have that property, and have led to a broadened perspective on the nature and action of Drosophila's sex-determination genes.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 266 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
United Kingdom 3 1%
Spain 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 256 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 55 21%
Researcher 51 19%
Student > Bachelor 36 14%
Student > Master 20 8%
Professor 15 6%
Other 46 17%
Unknown 43 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 122 46%
Neuroscience 38 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 32 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 2%
Computer Science 3 1%
Other 22 8%
Unknown 45 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2005.
All research outputs
#8,842,575
of 26,265,706 outputs
Outputs from Science
#52,127
of 82,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,896
of 19,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#115
of 205 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,265,706 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 82,785 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 67.6. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 19,568 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 205 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.