↓ Skip to main content

Modern statistical methods for handling missing repeated measurements in obesity trial data: beyond LOCF

Overview of attention for article published in Obesity Reviews, July 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Modern statistical methods for handling missing repeated measurements in obesity trial data: beyond LOCF
Published in
Obesity Reviews, July 2003
DOI 10.1046/j.1467-789x.2003.00109.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Germany 2 2%
Sweden 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 97 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 25%
Researcher 21 20%
Student > Master 12 11%
Professor 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Other 20 19%
Unknown 11 10%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 25%
Psychology 17 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 10%
Mathematics 10 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Other 17 16%
Unknown 21 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2016.
All research outputs
#5,701,475
of 26,187,546 outputs
Outputs from Obesity Reviews
#1,234
of 2,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,214
of 51,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Obesity Reviews
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,187,546 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,142 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.1. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 51,279 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them