You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Inverse Models: A Necessary Next Step in Ground‐Water Modeling
|
---|---|
Published in |
Ground Water, August 2005
|
DOI | 10.1111/j.1745-6584.1997.tb00082.x |
Authors |
Eileen P. Poeter, Mary C. Hill |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 3 | 3% |
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Finland | 1 | <1% |
India | 1 | <1% |
China | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 108 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 33 | 28% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 26% |
Student > Master | 12 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 4% |
Other | 18 | 15% |
Unknown | 13 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 42 | 35% |
Environmental Science | 26 | 22% |
Engineering | 20 | 17% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
Computer Science | 1 | <1% |
Other | 4 | 3% |
Unknown | 24 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2019.
All research outputs
#5,559,757
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Ground Water
#109
of 905 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,047
of 69,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ground Water
#21
of 267 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 905 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,432 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 267 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.