↓ Skip to main content

Depressed Mothers' Neonates Improve Following the MABI and a Brazelton Demonstration

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pediatric Psychology, December 1998
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Depressed Mothers' Neonates Improve Following the MABI and a Brazelton Demonstration
Published in
Journal of Pediatric Psychology, December 1998
DOI 10.1093/jpepsy/23.6.351
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To assess the effectiveness of a short-term intervention for improving interaction behaviors of newborn infants with their depressed mothers. Depressed mothers assigned to the experimental group first observed an administration of the Neonatal Behavioral Assessment Scale (NBAS) at delivery. Mothers then used a similar instrument, the Mother's Assessment of the Behavior of her Infant (MABI), to independently conduct NBAS-like infant assessments periodically at home. Depressed mothers in the control group were not present when the NBAS was administered at delivery, and they periodically completed written assessments at home of their parenting attitudes and infants' development. One-month NBAS assessments administered by an examiner revealed that experimental group infants performed more optimally than controls on Social Interaction and State Organization. Findings suggested that an intervention consisting of mothers taking part in NBAS/MABI assessments may be a simple and cost-effective technique for benefiting infants of depressed mothers during the early postpartum period.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Norway 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 117 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 18%
Student > Master 14 12%
Researcher 12 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Other 23 19%
Unknown 31 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 41 34%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 13%
Social Sciences 8 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 35 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2016.
All research outputs
#5,714,724
of 26,265,706 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pediatric Psychology
#646
of 1,736 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,861
of 108,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pediatric Psychology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,265,706 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,736 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,141 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them