↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
5 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Competition between α-actinin and Ca2+-Calmodulin Controls Surface Retention of the L-type Ca2+ Channel CaV1.2
Published in
Neuron, May 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.02.032
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Regulation of neuronal excitability and cardiac excitation-contraction coupling requires the proper localization of L-type Ca²⁺ channels. We show that the actin-binding protein α-actinin binds to the C-terminal surface targeting motif of α11.2, the central pore-forming Ca(V)1.2 subunit, in order to foster its surface expression. Disruption of α-actinin function by dominant-negative or small hairpin RNA constructs reduces Ca(V)1.2 surface localization in human embryonic kidney 293 and neuronal cultures and dendritic spine localization in neurons. We demonstrate that calmodulin displaces α-actinin from their shared binding site on α11.2 upon Ca²⁺ influx through L-type channels, but not through NMDAR, thereby triggering loss of Ca(V)1.2 from spines. Coexpression of a Ca²⁺-binding-deficient calmodulin mutant does not affect basal Ca(V)1.2 surface expression but inhibits its internalization upon Ca²⁺ influx. We conclude that α-actinin stabilizes Ca(V)1.2 at the plasma membrane and that its displacement by Ca²⁺-calmodulin triggers Ca²⁺-induced endocytosis of Ca(V)1.2, thus providing an important negative feedback mechanism for Ca²⁺ influx.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Portugal 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 102 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 29 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 21%
Student > Master 10 9%
Professor 9 8%
Other 4 4%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 22 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 30%
Neuroscience 23 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 5%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 24 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2013.
All research outputs
#15,739,529
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Neuron
#8,181
of 9,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,357
of 204,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuron
#73
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,543 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.2. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,330 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.