↓ Skip to main content

Validation of an advanced practice physiotherapy model of care in an orthopaedic outpatient clinic

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
14 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
180 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Validation of an advanced practice physiotherapy model of care in an orthopaedic outpatient clinic
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, May 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-14-162
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

In Canada, new models of orthopaedic care involving advanced practice physiotherapists (APP) are being implemented. In these new models, aimed at improving the efficiency of care for patients with musculoskeletal disorders, APPs diagnose, triage and conservatively treat patients. Formal validation of the efficiency and appropriateness of these emerging models is scarce. The purpose of this study is to assess the diagnostic agreement of an APP compared to orthopaedic surgeons as well as to assess treatment concordance, healthcare resource use, and patient satisfaction in this new model.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Unknown 175 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 39 22%
Student > Bachelor 17 9%
Researcher 14 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 6%
Other 9 5%
Other 34 19%
Unknown 56 31%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 48 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 38 21%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Engineering 4 2%
Other 19 11%
Unknown 61 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2025.
All research outputs
#1,447,865
of 30,031,778 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#214
of 4,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,787
of 215,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#3
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 30,031,778 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,854 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 215,897 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.