↓ Skip to main content

Where are we on worms?

Overview of attention for article published in Current opinion in gastroenterology, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#33 of 1,158)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages
reddit
2 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Where are we on worms?
Published in
Current opinion in gastroenterology, November 2012
DOI 10.1097/mog.0b013e3283572f73
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

There is something about living in an industrialized country that dramatically increases the risk of acquiring inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Loss of routine exposure to parasitic worms (helminths), due to modern highly hygienic life styles, likely contributes to this risk. This article reviews current understanding on how helminths influence intestinal inflammation and mucosal immune responses.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
Unknown 81 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 21%
Student > Bachelor 15 18%
Student > Master 10 12%
Researcher 9 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 14 17%
Unknown 12 14%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 18%
Immunology and Microbiology 10 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 17 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2024.
All research outputs
#1,383,664
of 34,536,218 outputs
Outputs from Current opinion in gastroenterology
#33
of 1,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,340
of 245,498 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current opinion in gastroenterology
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,536,218 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,158 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,498 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.