↓ Skip to main content

Evidence that cagA+Helicobacter pylori strains are disappearing more rapidly than cagA− strains

Overview of attention for article published in Gut, March 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Evidence that cagA+Helicobacter pylori strains are disappearing more rapidly than cagA− strains
Published in
Gut, March 2002
DOI 10.1136/gut.50.3.295
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The prevalence of Helicobacter pylori colonisation in populations in developed country has been declining, as shown by community based serological surveys of adults in Vammala, Finland in 1973 and 1994. In this study, we determined whether the proportion of subjects colonised by cagA(+) or cagA(-) H pylori strains has changed as the overall prevalence of H pylori(+) has declined. We examined 911 sera from Vammala's study for antibodies to the CagA antigen of H pylori using a truncated CagA protein as the antigen in an ELISA and we examined the trend in acquisition and carriage of cagA(+) strains. As expected, the prevalence of carriage of both cagA(+) and cagA(-) strains fell between 1973 and 1994 (p<0.001). However, the prevalence of cagA(+) strains among those <45 years declined (34% to 8%) significantly (p<0.001) more than for cagA(-) strains (12% to 6%). Of 221 subjects with paired serum samples, 12 (5.4%) changed H pylori status; the estimated seroconversion and reversion rates were 0.4% and 0.13% per year, respectively. Except for the few individuals who changed serostatus, absolute antibody levels to H pylori antigens, including CagA, changed little over the 21 year period. The decline in CagA seroprevalence predominantly reflects declining acquisition of cag(+) strains in younger subjects. In addition, these data confirm that H pylori acquisition chiefly occurs during childhood but continues to occur during adulthood, albeit at low rates, in developed countries.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Chile 1 4%
Unknown 21 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 17%
Student > Master 4 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Researcher 2 9%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 5 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2006.
All research outputs
#8,842,575
of 26,265,706 outputs
Outputs from Gut
#3,719
of 7,325 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,519
of 48,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gut
#20
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,265,706 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,325 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 48,233 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.