↓ Skip to main content

Dynamics of Helicobacter pylori colonization in relation to the host response

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, July 1999
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Dynamics of Helicobacter pylori colonization in relation to the host response
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, July 1999
DOI 10.1073/pnas.96.15.8359
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The dynamics of Helicobacter pylori colonization from its acquisition through the development of steady-state are examined through a mathematical model that includes the host response. The model encompasses both host and microbiological variation. The individual capacity of the host response is shown to be a key model parameter, leading to either transient or persistent colonization, whereas the growth rate of that response has little effect. Analyses of competing strains indicate that each must occupy a specific niche, otherwise exclusion occurs. The model implies that there exists a lower bound on the host response to the indigenous microflora that is consistent with current biological views of H. pylori. Parallel models may be useful in understanding other persistent host-microbial interactions.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 6 10%
Portugal 1 2%
Israel 1 2%
Unknown 50 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 19%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 12%
Professor 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 7 12%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 5%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 10 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2006.
All research outputs
#12,356,702
of 34,399,888 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#83,733
of 118,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,998
of 51,205 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#373
of 527 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,399,888 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 118,992 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.1. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 51,205 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 527 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.