↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of Antimicrobial Susceptibilities of Rapidly Growing Mycobacteria

Overview of attention for article published in Mikrobiyoloji bülteni, April 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of Antimicrobial Susceptibilities of Rapidly Growing Mycobacteria
Published in
Mikrobiyoloji bülteni, April 2023
DOI 10.5578/mb.20239917
Pubmed ID
Authors

Müge Hacer Özkarataş, Nazlı Arslan, Nuran Esen, Ayşe Aydan Özkütük

Abstract

Infections related to the rapidly growing mycobacteria (RGM), which are common in the environment, have clinical significance as they can affect both immunocompromised and immunocompetent patients. Treatment of RGM related infections is difficult, because they are resistant to many of the first-line tuberculosis agents, require a long-term multiple drug regimen, which is costly, and is associated with drugrelated toxicities. The aim of this study was to investigate the in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of RGM isolated in Dokuz Eylül University Hospital and also to reveal epidemiological data. A total of 58 isolates [(Mycobacterium fortuitum (n= 35), Mycobacterium abscessus (n= 19) and Mycobacterium chelonae (n= 4)], which were isolated in Dokuz Eylül University Hospital between 2013 and 2018, were subjected to in vitro testing for nine antimicrobial agents (amikacin, cefoxitin, ciprofloxacin, clarithromycin, doxycycline, imipenem, linezolid, moxifloxacin and tobramycin) with the broth microdilution method recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). For M.abscessus; 73.68% of the isolates were found susceptible to amikacin; 73.68% of isolates were susceptible to clarithromycin at early reading and only 21.05% of them remained susceptible at late reading time. No resistance to imipenem were observed. M.abscessus isolates were highly resistant to tobramycin, doxycycline and fluoroquinolones. Antibiotic susceptibility testing of M.chelonae isolates demonstrated 100% susceptibility for amikacin, clarithromycin and tobramycin. No resistance to linezolid, imipenem and moxifloxacin were observed. None of the isolates were susceptible to cefoxitin. Ciprofloxacin and doxycycline also showed poor in vitro activity against M.chelonae isolates. For M.fortuitum clarithromycin susceptibility decreased from 32.35% to 2.94% after an additional incubation until 14 days. All tested isolates of the M.fortuitum were susceptible to amikacin, ciprofloxacin and moxifloxacin. None of the M.fortuitum isolates exhibited resistance to cefoxitin and imipenem. Most of the M.fortuitum isolates were resistant to tobramycin and doxycycline. When the results were evaluated together, RGM isolates in this study were highly susceptible to amikacin; and were highly resistant to doxycycline. In conclusion, this study supported that the status of antimicrobial susceptibilities were different between species and also showed the importance for hospitals to know susceptibility patterns of isolates in their region. It should be noted that accurate species determination is critical for treatment as well as susceptibility status of rapidly growing mycobacteria to the antimicrobials in use.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 1 25%
Unknown 3 75%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 25%
Unknown 3 75%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2023.
All research outputs
#20,673,680
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Mikrobiyoloji bülteni
#171
of 379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#309,332
of 415,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mikrobiyoloji bülteni
#9
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 379 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.2. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 415,634 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.