↓ Skip to main content

Alzheimer's Residents' Cognitive and Functional Measures

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Nursing Research, February 1994
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Alzheimer's Residents' Cognitive and Functional Measures
Published in
Clinical Nursing Research, February 1994
DOI 10.1177/105477389400300104
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The aim of this field experiment was to compare the effects of a special care unit (SCU) on residents with Alzheimer's disease (AD) who lived on the SCU and on traditional (integrated) nursing home units. Twenty-two subjects, 13 on the SCU and 9 on traditional integrated units were compared. Repeated measures ANOVA was used to assess differences between the two groups and within the groups over two bimonthly pretests and two bimonthly posttests. No significant differences on cognitive or functional abilities scores were evident for the groups and no significant differences were found over time. However, consistent with the prediction of the Progressively Lower Stress Threshold Model, the SCU subjects' function was better than subjects on traditional units when measured by socially accessible behaviors.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Japan 1 4%
Unknown 24 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 16%
Student > Master 3 12%
Researcher 3 12%
Other 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Other 6 24%
Unknown 5 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 16%
Psychology 3 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 8%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 8 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2003.
All research outputs
#10,287,744
of 29,678,087 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Nursing Research
#142
of 467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,469
of 81,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Nursing Research
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,678,087 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,513 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.