↓ Skip to main content

The Use of Knee‐Length Versus Thigh‐Length Compression Stockings and Sequential Compression Devices

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care Nursing Quarterly, July 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#28 of 428)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The Use of Knee‐Length Versus Thigh‐Length Compression Stockings and Sequential Compression Devices
Published in
Critical Care Nursing Quarterly, July 2007
DOI 10.1097/01.cnq.0000278926.67562.2f
Pubmed ID
Authors

Debra Brady, Bonnie Raingruber, Janet Peterson, Winifred Varnau, James Denman, Raquel Resuello, Roumelia De Contreaus, Jaime Mahnke

Abstract

Nurses on an Acute Care Evidence Based Practice Committee, creating a policy to increase patient compliance with thromboembolic deterrent stockings (TEDS) and sequential compression devices (SCDs) for deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis, found limited literature on patient preference and response to this treatment.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 65 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 18%
Student > Bachelor 8 12%
Researcher 7 11%
Other 6 9%
Student > Postgraduate 5 8%
Other 12 18%
Unknown 15 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 14%
Engineering 4 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 16 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2023.
All research outputs
#5,803,681
of 27,780,120 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care Nursing Quarterly
#28
of 428 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,655
of 87,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care Nursing Quarterly
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,780,120 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 428 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 87,724 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them