↓ Skip to main content

Patient adverse events and technical failures with the bravo capsule pH system: insights from the MAUDE database

Overview of attention for article published in Esophagus, April 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#17 of 139)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Patient adverse events and technical failures with the bravo capsule pH system: insights from the MAUDE database
Published in
Esophagus, April 2023
DOI 10.1007/s10388-023-01007-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daryl Ramai, Peter Bhandari, Anjali Kewalramani, Daniel Mozell, Saurabh Chandan, Antonio Facciorusso, Paraskevas Gkolfakis, Arun Swaminath, Douglas G. Adler

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 25%
Unknown 3 75%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 1 25%
Unknown 3 75%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2023.
All research outputs
#6,626,070
of 24,654,957 outputs
Outputs from Esophagus
#17
of 139 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,478
of 396,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Esophagus
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,654,957 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 139 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,407 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.