↓ Skip to main content

Lynch syndrome-associated chordoma with high tumor mutational burden and significant response to immune checkpoint inhibitors

Overview of attention for article published in Brain Tumor Pathology, April 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Lynch syndrome-associated chordoma with high tumor mutational burden and significant response to immune checkpoint inhibitors
Published in
Brain Tumor Pathology, April 2023
DOI 10.1007/s10014-023-00461-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

Naoki Shinojima, Kazutaka Ozono, Haruaki Yamamoto, Sakiko Abe, Rumi Sasaki, Yusuke Tomita, Azusa Kai, Ryosuke Mori, Takahiro Yamamoto, Ken Uekawa, Hirotaka Matsui, Kisato Nosaka, Hiroaki Matsuzaki, Yoshihiro Komohara, Yoshiki Mikami, Akitake Mukasa

Abstract

Chordoma is a rare malignant bone tumor arising from notochordal tissue. Conventional treatments, such as radical resection and high-dose irradiation, frequently fail to control the tumor, resulting in recurrence and re-growth. In this study, genetic analysis of the tumor in a 72-year-old male patient with refractory conventional chordoma of the skull base revealed a high tumor mutational burden (TMB) and mutations in the MSH6 and MLH1 genes, which are found in Lynch syndrome. The patient and his family had a dense cancer history, and subsequent germline genetic testing revealed Lynch syndrome. This is the first report of a chordoma that has been genetically proven to be Lynch syndrome. Chordomas usually have low TMB; however, this is an unusual case, because the TMB was high, and immune checkpoint inhibitors effectively controlled the tumor. This case provides a basis for determining the indications for immunotherapy of chordoma based on the genetic analysis. Therefore, further extensive genetic analysis in the future will help to stratify the treatment of chordoma.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2023.
All research outputs
#18,679,008
of 23,861,036 outputs
Outputs from Brain Tumor Pathology
#88
of 175 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#257,776
of 376,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain Tumor Pathology
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,861,036 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 175 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 376,049 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.