↓ Skip to main content

The association between genetically elevated polyunsaturated fatty acids and risk of cancer

Overview of attention for article published in EBioMedicine, April 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
13 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The association between genetically elevated polyunsaturated fatty acids and risk of cancer
Published in
EBioMedicine, April 2023
DOI 10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104510
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fatty Acids in Cancer Mendelian Randomization Collaboration, Nathan Tintle, Terri Rice, Iona Cheng, Mark Jenkins, Steve Gallinger, Alex J. Cornish, Amit Sud, Jayaram Vijayakrishnan, Margaret Wrensch, Mattias Johansson, Aaron D. Norman, Alison Klein, Alyssa Clay-Gilmour, Andre Franke, Andres V. Ardisson Korat, Bill Wheeler, Björn Nilsson, Caren Smith, Chew-Kiat Heng, Ci Song, David Riadi, Elizabeth B. Claus, Eva Ellinghaus, Evgenia Ostroumova, Hosnijeh, Florent de Vathaire, Giovanni Cugliari, Giuseppe Matullo, Irene Oi-Lin Ng, Jeanette E. Passow, Jia Nee Foo, Jiali Han, Jianjun Liu, Jill Barnholtz-Sloan, Joellen M. Schildkraut, John Maris, Joseph L. Wiemels, Kari Hemminki, Keming Yang, Lambertus A. Kiemeney, Lang Wu, Laufey Amundadottir, Marc-Henri Stern, Marie-Christine Boutron, Mark Martin Iles, Mark P. Purdue, Martin Stanulla, Melissa Bondy, Mia Gaudet, Lenha Mobuchon, Nicola J. Camp, Pak Chung Sham, Pascal Guénel, Paul Brennan, Philip R. Taylor, Quinn Ostrom, Rachael Stolzenberg-Solomon, Rajkumar Dorajoo, Richard Houlston, Robert B. Jenkins, Sharon Diskin, Sonja I. Berndt, Spiridon Tsavachidis, Stephen J. Channock, Tabitha Harrison, Tessel Galesloot, Ulf Gyllensten, Vijai Joseph, Y. Shi, Wenjian Yang, Yi Lin, Stephen K. Van Den Eeden, Philip C. Haycock, Maria Carolina Borges, Kimberley Burrows, Rozenn N. Lemaitre, Stephen Burgess, Nikhil K. Khankari, Konstantinos K. Tsilidis, Tom R. Gaunt, Gibran Hemani, Jie Zheng, Therese Truong, Brenda M. Birmann, Tracy OMara, Amanda B. Spurdle, Mark M. Iles, Matthew H. Law, Susan L. Slager, Fatemeh Saberi Hosnijeh, Daniela Mariosa, Michelle Cotterchio, James R. Cerhan, Ulrike Peters, Stefan Enroth, Puya Gharahkhani, Loic Le Marchand, Ann C. Williams, Robert C. Block, ACCC, CCFR-CORECT-GECCO, EPITHYR, InterLymph, MMAC, ECAC, ILCCO, The PRACTICAL Consortium, PanScan, PanC4, Christopher I. Amos, Rayjean J. Hung, Wei Zheng, Marc J. Gunter, George Davey Smith, Caroline Relton, Richard M. Martin

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Researcher 3 6%
Student > Master 2 4%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 30 57%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Chemistry 2 4%
Engineering 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 31 58%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2025.
All research outputs
#2,480,035
of 34,332,845 outputs
Outputs from EBioMedicine
#1,108
of 5,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,604
of 441,890 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EBioMedicine
#33
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,332,845 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,086 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,890 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.