You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Focusing on Digital Research Priorities for Advancing the Access and Quality of Mental Health
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JMIR Mental Health, April 2023
|
| DOI | 10.2196/47898 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
John Torous, Nicole M Benson, Keris Myrick, Gunther Eysenbach |
| Abstract |
Digital mental health solutions are now well recognized as critical to solving the global mental health crisis. As research accelerates, it is now clear that solutions ranging from computer-based therapy programs to virtual reality headsets and smartphone apps to large language model chatbots are of interest, feasible, and hold exciting potential to improve mental health. This research should now consider the next generation of scientific and clinical questions regarding if these new approaches are equitable, valid, effective, implementable, efficacious, and even cost-effective. This paper outlines several of the new frontiers for the next generation of research and introduces JMIR Publications' partnership with the Society of Digital Psychiatry to further advance these aims. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 4 | 21% |
| United States | 4 | 21% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 11% |
| Ireland | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 47% |
| Scientists | 6 | 32% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 24% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 6 | 21% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 10% |
| Psychology | 3 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2023.
All research outputs
#794,563
of 25,145,981 outputs
Outputs from JMIR Mental Health
#64
of 931 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,894
of 398,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JMIR Mental Health
#3
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,145,981 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 931 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,968 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.