↓ Skip to main content

Apoptotic cell death in disease—Current understanding of the NCCD 2023

Overview of attention for article published in Cell Death & Differentiation, April 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#21 of 3,187)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
169 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
163 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Apoptotic cell death in disease—Current understanding of the NCCD 2023
Published in
Cell Death & Differentiation, April 2023
DOI 10.1038/s41418-023-01153-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ilio Vitale, Federico Pietrocola, Emma Guilbaud, Stuart A. Aaronson, John M. Abrams, Dieter Adam, Massimiliano Agostini, Patrizia Agostinis, Emad S. Alnemri, Lucia Altucci, Ivano Amelio, David W. Andrews, Rami I. Aqeilan, Eli Arama, Eric H. Baehrecke, Siddharth Balachandran, Daniele Bano, Nickolai A. Barlev, Jiri Bartek, Nicolas G. Bazan, Christoph Becker, Francesca Bernassola, Mathieu J. M. Bertrand, Marco E. Bianchi, Mikhail V. Blagosklonny, J. Magarian Blander, Giovanni Blandino, Klas Blomgren, Christoph Borner, Carl D. Bortner, Pierluigi Bove, Patricia Boya, Catherine Brenner, Petr Broz, Thomas Brunner, Rune Busk Damgaard, George A. Calin, Michelangelo Campanella, Eleonora Candi, Michele Carbone, Didac Carmona-Gutierrez, Francesco Cecconi, Francis K. -M. Chan, Guo-Qiang Chen, Quan Chen, Youhai H. Chen, Emily H. Cheng, Jerry E. Chipuk, John A. Cidlowski, Aaron Ciechanover, Gennaro Ciliberto, Marcus Conrad, Juan R. Cubillos-Ruiz, Peter E. Czabotar, Vincenzo D’Angiolella, Mads Daugaard, Ted M. Dawson, Valina L. Dawson, Ruggero De Maria, Bart De Strooper, Klaus-Michael Debatin, Ralph J. Deberardinis, Alexei Degterev, Giannino Del Sal, Mohanish Deshmukh, Francesco Di Virgilio, Marc Diederich, Scott J. Dixon, Brian D. Dynlacht, Wafik S. El-Deiry, John W. Elrod, Kurt Engeland, Gian Maria Fimia, Claudia Galassi, Carlo Ganini, Ana J. Garcia-Saez, Abhishek D. Garg, Carmen Garrido, Evripidis Gavathiotis, Motti Gerlic, Sourav Ghosh, Douglas R. Green, Lloyd A. Greene, Hinrich Gronemeyer, Georg Häcker, György Hajnóczky, J. Marie Hardwick, Ygal Haupt, Sudan He, David M. Heery, Michael O. Hengartner, Claudio Hetz, David A. Hildeman, Hidenori Ichijo, Satoshi Inoue, Marja Jäättelä, Ana Janic, Bertrand Joseph, Philipp J. Jost, Thirumala-Devi Kanneganti, Michael Karin, Hamid Kashkar, Thomas Kaufmann, Gemma L. Kelly, Oliver Kepp, Adi Kimchi, Richard N. Kitsis, Daniel J. Klionsky, Ruth Kluck, Dmitri V. Krysko, Dagmar Kulms, Sharad Kumar, Sergio Lavandero, Inna N. Lavrik, John J. Lemasters, Gianmaria Liccardi, Andreas Linkermann, Stuart A. Lipton, Richard A. Lockshin, Carlos López-Otín, Tom Luedde, Marion MacFarlane, Frank Madeo, Walter Malorni, Gwenola Manic, Roberto Mantovani, Saverio Marchi, Jean-Christophe Marine, Seamus J. Martin, Jean-Claude Martinou, Pier G. Mastroberardino, Jan Paul Medema, Patrick Mehlen, Pascal Meier, Gerry Melino, Sonia Melino, Edward A. Miao, Ute M. Moll, Cristina Muñoz-Pinedo, Daniel J. Murphy, Maria Victoria Niklison-Chirou, Flavia Novelli, Gabriel Núñez, Andrew Oberst, Dimitry Ofengeim, Joseph T. Opferman, Moshe Oren, Michele Pagano, Theocharis Panaretakis, Manolis Pasparakis, Josef M. Penninger, Francesca Pentimalli, David M. Pereira, Shazib Pervaiz, Marcus E. Peter, Paolo Pinton, Giovanni Porta, Jochen H. M. Prehn, Hamsa Puthalakath, Gabriel A. Rabinovich, Krishnaraj Rajalingam, Kodi S. Ravichandran, Markus Rehm, Jean-Ehrland Ricci, Rosario Rizzuto, Nirmal Robinson, Cecilia M. P. Rodrigues, Barak Rotblat, Carla V. Rothlin, David C. Rubinsztein, Thomas Rudel, Alessandro Rufini, Kevin M. Ryan, Kristopher A. Sarosiek, Akira Sawa, Emre Sayan, Kate Schroder, Luca Scorrano, Federico Sesti, Feng Shao, Yufang Shi, Giuseppe S. Sica, John Silke, Hans-Uwe Simon, Antonella Sistigu, Anastasis Stephanou, Brent R. Stockwell, Flavie Strapazzon, Andreas Strasser, Liming Sun, Erwei Sun, Qiang Sun, Gyorgy Szabadkai, Stephen W. G. Tait, Daolin Tang, Nektarios Tavernarakis, Carol M. Troy, Boris Turk, Nicoletta Urbano, Peter Vandenabeele, Tom Vanden Berghe, Matthew G. Vander Heiden, Jacqueline L. Vanderluit, Alexei Verkhratsky, Andreas Villunger, Silvia von Karstedt, Anne K. Voss, Karen H. Vousden, Domagoj Vucic, Daniela Vuri, Erwin F. Wagner, Henning Walczak, David Wallach, Ruoning Wang, Ying Wang, Achim Weber, Will Wood, Takahiro Yamazaki, Huang-Tian Yang, Zahra Zakeri, Joanna E. Zawacka-Pankau, Lin Zhang, Haibing Zhang, Boris Zhivotovsky, Wenzhao Zhou, Mauro Piacentini, Guido Kroemer, Lorenzo Galluzzi

Abstract

Apoptosis is a form of regulated cell death (RCD) that involves proteases of the caspase family. Pharmacological and genetic strategies that experimentally inhibit or delay apoptosis in mammalian systems have elucidated the key contribution of this process not only to (post-)embryonic development and adult tissue homeostasis, but also to the etiology of multiple human disorders. Consistent with this notion, while defects in the molecular machinery for apoptotic cell death impair organismal development and promote oncogenesis, the unwarranted activation of apoptosis promotes cell loss and tissue damage in the context of various neurological, cardiovascular, renal, hepatic, infectious, neoplastic and inflammatory conditions. Here, the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death (NCCD) gathered to critically summarize an abundant pre-clinical literature mechanistically linking the core apoptotic apparatus to organismal homeostasis in the context of disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 169 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 163 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 12%
Researcher 18 11%
Unspecified 11 7%
Student > Bachelor 11 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 28 17%
Unknown 65 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 29 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 9%
Unspecified 11 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 4%
Other 20 12%
Unknown 73 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 99. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2024.
All research outputs
#436,285
of 25,773,273 outputs
Outputs from Cell Death & Differentiation
#21
of 3,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,890
of 413,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Death & Differentiation
#1
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,773,273 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,187 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 413,883 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.