You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Twin-width can be exponential in treewidth
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Combinatorial Theory - Series B, July 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jctb.2023.01.003 |
| Authors |
Édouard Bonnet, Hugues Déprés |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematics | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2022.
All research outputs
#8,685,376
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Combinatorial Theory - Series B
#95
of 568 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,637
of 373,519 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Combinatorial Theory - Series B
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 568 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,519 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.