↓ Skip to main content

Diversified innovations in the health sciences: Proposal for a Diversity Minimal Item Set (DiMIS)

Overview of attention for article published in Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy , June 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#8 of 286)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diversified innovations in the health sciences: Proposal for a Diversity Minimal Item Set (DiMIS)
Published in
Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy , June 2023
DOI 10.1016/j.scp.2023.101072
Authors

Gertraud Stadler, Marie Chesaniuk, Stephanie Haering, Julia Roseman, Vera Maren Straßburger, Schraudner Martina, Diversity Assessment Working Group, Ahmad Aisha-Nusrat, Auma Maisha, Banas Kasia, Borde Theda, Buspavanich Pichit, Dewey Marc, Di Maio Sally, Ditlmann Ruth, Enarovic Ilona, Fischer Marina, Gellert Paul, Gerstorf Denis, Grittner Ulrike, Gutsell Jennifer, Hagelskamp Carolin, Henschel Anna, Herrmann Wolfram, Hilger Caren, Horozoglu Gülru, Hövener Claudia, Hunter Emma, Iida Masumi, Keller Lena, Kendel Friederike, Krumbholz Charlotte Ariane, Licha Matthias, Mason Kimberly, Mata Jutta, Mau Steffen, Meuwly Nathalie, Moschko Tomasz, Müller-Werdan Ursula, O'Sullivan Julie Lorraine, Radl Jonas, Rathmann Christian, Regitz-Zagrosek Vera, Rieckmann Nina, Rommel Alexander, Salikutluk Zerrin, E. Shrout Patrick, Smith Jamie, Specht Jule, Stephan Petra, Stock Christiane, Wenzel Mine

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Researcher 2 7%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 3%
Student > Bachelor 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 18 62%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 4 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 18 62%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2023.
All research outputs
#3,028,088
of 25,756,911 outputs
Outputs from Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy
#8
of 286 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,142
of 392,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy
#2
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,756,911 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 286 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 392,765 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.