Detection of saccades (fast eye-movements) within raw mobile electrooculography (EOG) data involves complex algorithms which typically process data acquired during seated static tasks only. Processing of data during dynamic tasks such as walking is relatively rare and complex, particularly in older adults or people with Parkinson's disease (PD). Development of algorithms that can be easily implemented to detect saccades is required. This study aimed to develop an algorithm for the detection and measurement of saccades in EOG data during static (sitting) and dynamic (walking) tasks, in older adults and PD. Eye-tracking via mobile EOG and infra-red (IR) eye-tracker (with video) was performed with a group of older adults (n = 10) and PD participants (n = 10) (⩾50 years). Horizontal saccades made between targets set 5°, 10° and 15° apart were first measured while seated. Horizontal saccades were then measured while a participant walked and executed a 40° turn left and right. The EOG algorithm was evaluated by comparing the number of correct saccade detections and agreement (ICC2,1) between output from visual inspection of eye-tracker videos and IR eye-tracker. The EOG algorithm detected 75-92% of saccades compared to video inspection and IR output during static testing, with fair to excellent agreement (ICC2,1 0.49-0.93). However, during walking EOG saccade detection reduced to 42-88% compared to video inspection or IR output, with poor to excellent (ICC2,1 0.13-0.88) agreement between methodologies. The algorithm was robust during seated testing but less so during walking, which was likely due to increased measurement and analysis error with a dynamic task. Future studies may consider a combination of EOG and IR for comprehensive measurement.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2017.
All research outputs
#12,929,609
of 22,815,414 outputs
Outputs from Physiological Measurement
#950
of 1,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,129
of 418,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physiological Measurement
#10
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,815,414 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,385 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 418,621 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
