↓ Skip to main content

Importance of survey demographic questions to foster inclusion in medicine and research and reduce health inequities for LGBTQIA2S+ individuals

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Physiology: Heart & Circulatory Physiology, April 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
23 X users
bluesky
1 Bluesky user

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Importance of survey demographic questions to foster inclusion in medicine and research and reduce health inequities for LGBTQIA2S+ individuals
Published in
American Journal of Physiology: Heart & Circulatory Physiology, April 2023
DOI 10.1152/ajpheart.00152.2023
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

A clear, inclusive, and accurate approach to the collection of demographic information in clinical research and medical practice is critical to understanding the healthcare needs of the specific population. Inclusive demography constitutes appropriate and accurate characterization of an individual's sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) data. Appropriate demography fosters sense of inclusion and belonging for those belonging to medically marginalized communities such as the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, asexual, and Indigenous Two-Spirit (LGBTQIA2S+) communities and improves health outcomes. Acquiring inclusive demographics in healthcare research is needed for the following critical reasons. Firstly, LGBTQIA2S+ individuals experience undue psychological harm when their identities are not appropriately captured in survey data, promoting further alienation of the LGBTQIA2S+ community in medicine and research. Secondly, LGBTQIA2S+ populations are disproportionately burdened by several major cardiovascular and cardiovascular-associated diseases, including hypertension and diabetes. Failure to include these populations, and accurately characterize their participation, in research leads to failure to identify associations between identities and disease, resulting in worse health outcomes. Further, this lack of precision in current data for sex, gender, and sexual orientation may lead to inaccurate data for all populations, not just the LGBTQIA2S+ community. Lastly, there are currently major political and social threats and attacks on the LGBTQIA2S+ community and, in particular, on transgender and gender diverse individuals. Proper medical inclusion and advocacy for the LGBTQIA2S+ community by the medical community may help protect the community from further undue harm through creating sense of belonging and reductions in marginalization-related health inequities.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 7%
Researcher 2 7%
Other 1 4%
Lecturer 1 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 18 67%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 7%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Computer Science 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 18 67%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2026.
All research outputs
#2,876,754
of 34,560,275 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Physiology: Heart & Circulatory Physiology
#324
of 7,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,132
of 440,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Physiology: Heart & Circulatory Physiology
#10
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,560,275 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,465 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,405 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.