Sleep position does not appear to influence the risk of extreme cardiorespiratory events in vulnerable infants

Overview of attention for article published in Evidence Based Nursing, October 2012

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter: 8 X users

Readers on

mendeley: 8 Mendeley

You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.

Article details
Title	Sleep position does not appear to influence the risk of extreme cardiorespiratory events in vulnerable infants
Published in	Evidence Based Nursing, October 2012
DOI	10.1136/eb-2012-101003
Pubmed ID	23100259
Authors	Dawn E Elder
Abstract	Implications for practice and research: Extreme cardiorespiratory events can be documented during sleep and are more common in immature preterm infants. The supine sleep position does not appear to decrease the risk of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) by decreasing the risk of extreme cardiorespiratory events in vulnerable infants. Reasons for the physiological advantage of the supine sleep position remain speculative and require ongoing study despite decreases in SIDS death rates in recent years.

View on publisher site Alert me about new mentions

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline

Activity

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country	Count	As %
Netherlands	4	50%
Unknown	4	50%

Demographic breakdown

Type
Type	Count	As %
Members of the public	7	88%
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)	1	13%

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country	Count	As %
Unknown	8	100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status	Count	As %
Other	1	13%
Student > Bachelor	1	13%
Student > Master	1	13%
Researcher	1	13%
Professor > Associate Professor	1	13%
Other	0	0%
Unknown	3	38%

Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline	Count	As %
Psychology	1	13%
Social Sciences	1	13%
Neuroscience	1	13%
Engineering	1	13%
Unknown	4	50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2013.

All research outputs

#5,257,358

of 27,369,606 outputs

Outputs from Evidence Based Nursing

#224

of 1,527 outputs

Outputs of similar age

#38,080

of 208,161 outputs

Outputs of similar age from Evidence Based Nursing

of 33 outputs

Altmetric has tracked 27,369,606 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.

So far Altmetric has tracked 1,527 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.

Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,161 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.

We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.