You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Etomidate as an induction agent for endotracheal intubation in critically ill patients: A meta-analysis of randomized trials
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Critical Care, April 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jcrc.2023.154317 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yuki Kotani, Gioia Piersanti, Giacomo Maiucci, Stefano Fresilli, Stefano Turi, Giada Montanaro, Alberto Zangrillo, Todd C Lee, Giovanni Landoni |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 465 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 53 | 11% |
| Mexico | 35 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 16 | 3% |
| Colombia | 15 | 3% |
| Spain | 13 | 3% |
| Brazil | 11 | 2% |
| Chile | 8 | 2% |
| Ecuador | 8 | 2% |
| France | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 73 | 16% |
| Unknown | 226 | 49% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 380 | 82% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 58 | 12% |
| Scientists | 24 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 6 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
| Researcher | 3 | 9% |
| Professor | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 15% |
| Unknown | 13 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 53% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
| Psychology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 11 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 325. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2024.
All research outputs
#105,259
of 25,834,578 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Critical Care
#2
of 2,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,663
of 412,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Critical Care
#1
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,834,578 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,485 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 412,929 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.