↓ Skip to main content

On the influence of an equatorial cerclage on closure of posterior retinal detachment

Overview of attention for article published in IMA Journal of Mathematics Applied in Medicine & Biology, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
On the influence of an equatorial cerclage on closure of posterior retinal detachment
Published in
IMA Journal of Mathematics Applied in Medicine & Biology, September 2015
DOI 10.1093/imammb/dqv028
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

A mechanics-based mathematical model of an eye possessing a posterior retinal detachment is presented for the case where an encircling scleral buckle (a cerclage) is sutured around the equator of the eye. The mechanical behaviour of the retina and the globe, both before and after applying the cerclage, is studied. An energy formulation yields the self-consistent equations of equilibrium and boundary conditions of the ocular system, and analytical solutions are established for the scleral buckle, for the globe and for the detached segment of the retina. Results of numerical simulations based on the solutions unveil characteristic behaviour of the ocular system, and demonstrate the influence of the scleral buckle, as well as of the pressure difference between the vitreous cavity and the subretinal space, on the deformation of the eye and on closing the region of retinal detachment. The results indicate that a scleral buckle encircling the equator, normally used for closing retinal tears and associated retinal detachments in the immediate vicinity of the buckle, can have a marked influence on bringing the detached segment of neurosensory retina back into contact with the retinal pigment epithelium, even for detachments at the posterior of the eye.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 40%
Unknown 3 60%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 40%
Mathematics 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2016.
All research outputs
#28,604,603
of 34,364,397 outputs
Outputs from IMA Journal of Mathematics Applied in Medicine & Biology
#145
of 198 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#236,446
of 304,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age from IMA Journal of Mathematics Applied in Medicine & Biology
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,364,397 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 198 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,054 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.