↓ Skip to main content

Defining best practice for microarray analyses in nutrigenomic studies

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Nutrition, March 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
patent
4 patents

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Defining best practice for microarray analyses in nutrigenomic studies
Published in
British Journal of Nutrition, March 2007
DOI 10.1079/bjn20041385
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Turkey 2 4%
Argentina 2 4%
United States 1 2%
Sweden 1 2%
Poland 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
India 1 2%
Ireland 1 2%
Finland 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 40 77%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 23%
Professor 5 10%
Student > Master 5 10%
Other 2 4%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 5 10%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 44%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 12%
Environmental Science 3 6%
Engineering 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 9 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2021.
All research outputs
#5,056,682
of 34,054,827 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Nutrition
#2,219
of 7,523 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,311
of 127,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Nutrition
#431
of 2,083 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,054,827 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,523 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 127,717 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,083 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.