↓ Skip to main content

A unifying quantitative framework for exploring the multiple facets of microbial biodiversity across diverse scales

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Microbiology, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
133 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A unifying quantitative framework for exploring the multiple facets of microbial biodiversity across diverse scales
Published in
Environmental Microbiology, June 2013
DOI 10.1111/1462-2920.12156
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Recent developments of molecular tools have revolutionized our knowledge of microbial biodiversity by allowing detailed exploration of its different facets and generating unprecedented amount of data. One key issue with such large datasets is the development of diversity measures that cope with different data outputs and allow comparison of biodiversity across different scales. Diversity has indeed three components: local (α), regional (γ) and the overall difference between local communities (β). Current measures of microbial diversity, derived from several approaches, provide complementary but different views. They only capture the β component of diversity, compare communities in a pairwise way, consider all species as equivalent or lack a mathematically explicit relationship among the α, β and γ components. We propose a unified quantitative framework based on the Rao quadratic entropy, to obtain an additive decomposition of diversity (γ = α + β), so the three components can be compared, and that integrate the relationship (phylogenetic or functional) among Microbial Diversity Units that compose a microbial community. We show how this framework is adapted to all types of molecular data, and we highlight crucial issues in microbial ecology that would benefit from this framework and propose ready-to-use R-functions to easily set up our approach.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 6 5%
France 4 3%
Brazil 4 3%
United Kingdom 2 2%
India 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 111 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 38 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 22%
Professor > Associate Professor 14 11%
Student > Master 13 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 5%
Other 21 16%
Unknown 11 8%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 59 44%
Environmental Science 32 24%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 2%
Chemistry 3 2%
Other 7 5%
Unknown 24 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2013.
All research outputs
#19,305,004
of 28,004,132 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Microbiology
#3,769
of 4,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,335
of 216,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Microbiology
#30
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,004,132 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,784 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 216,906 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.